FLSA Overtime Rules Delayed

Prior to November 22, 2016, many in the Human Resources field had been abuzz about the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Final Rule. For some organizations, months of preparation for the December 1st change included reviewing job descriptions, in order to determine the position’s exemption status, and making changes to employee salaries vis-à-vis the new exempt threshold. However, on November 22, 2016, Judge Amos Mazzant III enacted an injunction, successfully halting activation of the new FLSA rules. The preliminary injunction is based off the challenge by several states, business groups, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The plaintiffs claim the DOL has overstepped its authority by raising the salary threshold for exempt status excessively high. Of course, this injunction raises new questions. What is the Department of Labor’s (DOL) response? What do organizations do in the meantime?

The DOL’s official response to injunction was as follows: “The Department strongly disagrees with the decision by the court, which has the effect of delaying a fair day's pay for a long day's work for millions of hardworking Americans. The Department’s Overtime Final Rule is the result of a comprehensive, inclusive rule-making process, and we remain confident in the legality of all aspects of the rule. We are currently considering all of our legal options.”

So what do organizations do in the meantime? While some may speculate that with a Trump administration taking office soon, this mandate may disappear. However, it may not be safe to assume so. The attempt to rollback this rule may not happen right away. There is also the possibility that the Trump administration could issue a smaller increase to the salary threshold than the one initially included in the Final Rule.

Notwithstanding these developments, Michael Maciekowich of Astron Solutions reminds us that the FLSA tests for determining position exemptions have not changed. It is better to be safe than sorry, as a previous court case in Kinkead v. Humana, Inc. demonstrates.

The court case involved a final rule to extend minimum wage and overtime protections to workers who work in live-in domestic services or companion services beginning January 2015. In very similar fashion to the current FLSA overtime adjustments, the companionship exemption enactment was postponed in January 2015, as a federal judge from D.C. struck the rule down, charging that the DOL was overstepping its authority. However, in October of 2015 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed this district court order. Humana argued that they shouldn’t be liable during the period the companionship exemption had been vacated. The courts decided Humanawas liable.

Another aspect to consider is your city and /or state regulations. If adjustments for your organization’s city or state are equal to or higher than the Final Rule’s regulations, organizations would still need to be in compliance with the law that’s most generous to the employee. As always, it is best for organizations to seek legal counsel in order to assuage any concerns from both employers and employees.

What was your organization’s reaction to the late initiated injunction? We look forward to hearing our readers share their input and thoughts on this late-breaking news!

The Fissured Workplace and Employee Misclassification

In recent times, companies such as Uber and Handy have been faced with lawsuits challenging whether the individuals working for them should truly be considered “contractors.” Are their “staff” in reality employees being denied rights reserved to those in the proper classification? In this issue of Astronology® we explore the fissured workplace and the accompanying issue of employee misclassification. How large of an issue is misclassifying employees? Is this part of larger concerns related to the fissured workplace?

What is the Fissured Workplace?
David Weil, an administrator for the United States Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, popularized the term “fissured workplace” to describe the surge in employers’ use of contracted laborers. In 2014 Weil highlighted on the US Department of Labor’s blog what results from workplace fissuring: “The blurred lines from the fissured workplace make achieving compliance with the wage and hour laws we enforce a difficult task. Intense competition between business models like subcontracting, temporary agencies, labor brokers, franchising, licensing, and third-party management leads to low pay, and noncompliance pulls down standards for all – making it difficult for responsible employers to survive in low margin, fiercely competitive conditions. The costs in this race to be the lowest bidder are borne by workers deprived of their wages and their rights.” There’s a danger involved in a fissuring workplace: the danger of misclassification.

The Growth of Contracted Workers
But how many people actually are working in an independent contractor arrangement? To get a better understanding, economists Larry Katz and Alan Krueger replicated the 2005 Contingent Worker Survey in 2015. The results of the survey provide an estimate of how much labor is being contracted out by employers in the United States. The 2015 survey noted a jump from 10% in 2005 to 16% of workers in 2015 in “alternative arrangements,” working while not directly being an employee of an organization. Why the increase in outsourcing and contracting? In a Wall Street Journal online article, Anna Louie Sussman and Josh Zumbrun point to fissuring.

The Consequences of Misclassifying Workers in a Fissured Workplace
The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) website explains that although the department supports the proper use of independent contractors, there is a difference between legitimate independent contractors and misclassified employees. By classifying a worker as an independent contractor, an employer avoids expenses such as overtime pay, unemployment compensation tax, workers’ compensation insurance, and employee benefits such as sick pay & vacation. Such attempts to cut costs results in losses for everyone, however. Not only are employees cheated, but heavy fines from organizations found guilty of misclassification can add up to 41.5% of the contractor’s pay. Also of note is that these penalties can go as far back as three years. As a result, the WHD has worked with the IRS and many states to combat worker misclassifications. With 32 states cooperating in 2015, the WHD investigations resulted in more than $74 million in back wages for more than 102,000 workers in a variety of industries, including janitorial and hospitality.

“In general, independent contractors should comprise a small minority of most employers’ workforces,” states Jennifer Loftus, National Director for Astron Solutions. “Activities that are non-strategic in nature, and not the primary focus on the organization, are best candidates for outsourcing. When independent contractors or contract labor begin to comprise a noticeable and / or large portion of the workforce, the organization leaves the door open to lawsuits and investigations. When in doubt about workers’ proper classifications, check with outside legal counsel or other outside advisors. Proactive protection to the organization is advisable over negative consequences down the road.” Do you think fissuring workplaces will be curtailed as more misclassified employee cases come to light? Tell us your thoughts! We enjoy hearing from our Astronology® readers!

What I'm Hearing...Wage and Hour Lawsuits

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been hearing more and more about wage and hour lawsuits. It seems the U.S. Department of Labor is stepping up its investigation of wage and hour complaints. Now, more than ever, it’s essential to make sure your FLSA exempt / non-exempt classifications, and associated job descriptions, are accurate and up to date. White collar positions including store managers, IT positions, and sales reps are the next wave of DOL investigation. In the past, traditional non-exempt positions have been the focus.

According to Fortune Small Business, key areas to examine are “executive assistant” positions, IT employees, pay docking practices, the impact of telecommuting on compensation, provision of comp time, and the use of stock options.

FLSA compliance has always been a thorny issue. While the new 2004 regulations helped in a variety of areas, compliance continues to vex HR professionals and their business line managers. Proactively updating your job descriptions and auditing your exemptions should help to prevent your organization from being targeted for lawsuits by employees and the DOL.